The Economic Approaches Used to Determine FRAND Royalty Rates in TCL v. Ericsson


On November 8, 2017, Judge James Selna of the US District Court in the Central District of California issued a decision (published later on December 21st) in TCL v. Ericsson determining fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) royalty rates for Ericsson’s standard essential patent (SEP) portfolios for the 2G, 3G, and 4G cellular standards. Not only does this decision establish the FRAND royalty rate for a major licensor’s cellular SEP portfolios, but it also lays out an economic framework for determining FRAND royalty rates that may be used by manufacturers, SEP holders, and courts in future FRAND rate-setting contexts.

In this Law360 article, Edgeworth Partners Dr. Fei Deng and Dr. Mario Lopez unpack how the Court arrived at the FRAND rates, highlight key takeaways, and provide an economist’s perspective on some of the relevant issues.



Jump to Page

This website uses cookies to improve functionality and performance. By continuing to use this website, you agree to the use of cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy